Case 6011624/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Kruszewska v Yo! Sushi, Snowfox group — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011624/2024
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Kruszewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, M Kruszewska, brought an unfair dismissal complaint against Yo! Sushi, Snowfox group. The tribunal stated that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years. On that basis, it held that she was not entitled to bring the proceedings. It also recorded that the claimant had been given the opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but had not given an acceptable reason.
The judgment accordingly struck out the unfair dismissal claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had less than two years' service and gave no acceptable reason why the claim should continue. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.