Case 6011633/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Anthony Devine v Flint Office Space Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6011633/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anthony Devine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a Senior Contracts Manager from 10 July 2023 to 3 May 2024. His contract provided for a salary of £82,000 per year plus commission of 10% of any betterment of baseline project gross profit, payable when each project was completed and agreed both financially and to the client’s satisfaction. The tribunal found that the commission clause did not make payment dependent on the claimant’s individual contribution to the betterment, provided he had worked on the project.
The tribunal preferred the respondent’s project documentation to the claimant’s figures, subject to a few specific adjustments, and found commission was due on Wendy Wu, Ithaca, Metanoia and Sequel. It held that the respondent had no contractual basis for paying only 50% of the commission on Wendy Wu and Ithaca, and that this caused a deduction of wages on 31 December 2023. It also found further underpayments on Metanoia and Sequel, and treated the underpayments as a series of unlawful deductions rather than a breach of contract claim arising on termination. The tribunal found no commission due on the remaining projects because there was no betterment on the facts found, or insufficient reliable evidence to establish one.
The total commission still due was found to be £8,150.96, subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance. The tribunal also noted that the respondent had overpaid £5,000 to the claimant’s bank account in error and that this should be recouped from any net balance payable. On the holiday issue, the tribunal found the claimant took annual leave on 16 and 19 February 2024, did some work on 19 February, but remained on leave and had no outstanding holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to unpaid commission on Wendy Wu, Ithaca, Metanoia and Sequel. It held the respondent had underpaid by paying only 50% of commission on Wendy Wu and Ithaca without agreement, and that further sums remained due on Metanoia and Sequel. The £5,000 overpayment to the claimant’s bank account was to be recouped from any net balance, and tax and National Insurance were to be accounted for. | Upheld | — | £8,151 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had booked annual leave on 16 and 19 February 2024, did some work on 19 February, but remained on annual leave. It held that no holiday pay was outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,151
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.