Case 6011646/2024 · Employment Tribunal
G Adamczak v Linkline Transport Limited (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011646/2024
- Decision date
- 22 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Adamczak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short default judgment in which the claimant, G Adamczak, brought a claim against Linkline Transport Limited (in administration) and presented it in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 13 September 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. No substantive findings on the underlying facts or the specific legal basis of the claim are set out in the extracted text, so the precise claim type cannot be identified from the judgment alone. The judgment states that the remedy entitlement will be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive head of claim. It records that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.