Case 6011806/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ouslimane v Octaga — 2024
- Case reference
- 6011806/2024
- Decision date
- 9 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ouslimane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 9 November 2024, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out because he had not shown 2 years' continuous employment.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the dismissal complaint. Its basis for strike-out was the claimant's failure to show the qualifying period of continuous employment required for the unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal noted that the claimant's remaining race discrimination claim would continue, and that a final hearing date would be set at the case management hearing on 14 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had not shown 2 years' continuous employment. The judgment records that the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 9 November 2024 to make representations or request a hearing before strike-out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.