Case 6011834/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Duffy v Sky Subscribers Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011834/2024
- Decision date
- 17 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Duffy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Duffy brought complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract in relation to notice pay against Sky Subscribers Services Limited. The case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 19-20 August 2025 before Employment Judge Phil Allen sitting alone. The written record states that the tribunal gave reasons orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that the breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay was not well-founded and dismissed it. The record does not set out separate findings on remedy, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The complaint was in relation to notice pay and was dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.