Case 6011912/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Lars Winzer v IW Group Services (UK) Limited — 2026

Case reference: 6011912/2025
Decision date: 28 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lancaster

Indexed: 14 September 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Lars Winzer

Respondent

IW Group Services (UK) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Lars Winzer's claim against IW Group Services (UK) Ltd was struck out. The Tribunal wrote to Winzer on 12 January 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated grounds were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and that Winzer had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 04 August 2025, particularly paragraphs 6, 7 and 8.

The letter gave Winzer an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. He did not reply. Employment Judge Lancaster found that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that striking out the claim accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment was approved on 28 April 2026. It does not identify individual causes of action or record a monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole without identifying the underlying causes of action.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.