Case 6011932/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Morrison v Levs Delivery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011932/2024
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Morrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 17 September 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £830.24. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross amount of £500.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay the gross amount of £830.24. | Upheld | — | £830 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay the gross amount of £500.00. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,330
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.