Case 6011942/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Palmer v The Travellers Joy — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011942/2025
- Decision date
- 13 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 13 December 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 28 September 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing, but did not reply. Employment Judge Self was satisfied that the grounds for strike out under Rule 38 applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim without separately analysing this claim type; classification follows the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim without separately analysing this claim type; classification follows the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.