Case 6012000/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Sara Ramiro Vizcarrondo v Tigris International Wholesale PART — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012000/2026
- Decision date
- 21 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sara Ramiro Vizcarrondo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSara Ramiro Vizcarrondo presented her claim in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 6 April 2026. The respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Dawson decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The part judgment found that Tigris International Wholesale had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered it to pay £3,671. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,575. These two awards total £9,246.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,671 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,575 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,246
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.