Case 6012030/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Steel v W.H. Pubco Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012030/2025
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Steel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remedy hearing on 16 June 2025 at Newcastle Employment Tribunal, conducted remotely by CVP, Employment Judge Sweeney sat alone. The claimant, Mr J Steel, appeared in person. The respondent, W.H. Pubco Ltd, did not attend and was not represented. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal ordered payment of £577 for wages unlawfully deducted and £672.96 for holiday pay due on termination of employment. Those two sums made up the total payable to Mr Steel, which the tribunal recorded as £1,249.96. No other remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the amount of wages unlawfully deducted by the respondent was £577 and ordered that sum to be paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to £672.96 holiday pay on termination of employment and ordered that sum to be paid to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.