Case 6012057/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Marc Knight v Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012057/2025
- Decision date
- 27 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Swansea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marc Knight
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge G Duncan, sitting at Swansea on 26 and 27 January 2026, determined the claim brought by Mr Marc Knight against the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA). The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Katharine Bailey of Counsel.
The Tribunal found that the claim for failure to provide reasonable adjustments was well founded. The judgment does not set out the detailed reasoning, factual findings, or legal tests on its face; only the operative orders are recorded in the available text.
By way of remedy, the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £4,500 for injury to feelings and £509 for financial loss. The judgment was signed on 28 January 2026 and sent to the parties on 29 January 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments found well founded. Award comprises £4,500 for injury to feelings and £509 for financial loss. | Upheld | Disability | £5,009 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,009
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.