Case 6012068/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Victoria Robinson v DT York Opco Limited t/a Double Tree by Hilton York — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012068/2025
- Decision date
- 8 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Victoria Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 8 July 2026, Employment Judge D N Jones determined that Miss Victoria Robinson's claim of unfair dismissal on the ground of having made protected disclosures was presented in time. The judge also determined that her protected-disclosure detriment claim concerning additional duties and excessive hours was presented in time, if the matters alleged constituted a series of acts or failures continuing until 31 October 2024. The judgment did not decide the merits of those claims.
By consent, the Tribunal found that the unauthorised deductions claim concerning payment below the national minimum wage and the protected-disclosure detriment claim concerning excessive phone calls and texts were presented out of time and dismissed them. No remedy was determined or awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The preliminary hearing determined only that the claim of unfair dismissal on the ground of having made protected disclosures was presented in time; the merits were not decided. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The alleged detriment of being required to undertake additional duties and work excessive hours was presented in time, if it constituted a series of acts or failures continuing until 31 October 2024; the merits were not decided. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | By consent, the alleged detriment of bombardment with excessive phone calls and texts on the ground that the claimant had made protected disclosures was presented out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the claim of unauthorised deductions from wages concerning payment below the national minimum wage was presented out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.