Case 6012072/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Dorota Tanistra v Sakku Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012072/2025
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dorota Tanistra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for a statutory redundancy payment against Sakku Ltd. The hearing took place remotely by CVP at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 19 June 2025 before Employment Judge Sweeney. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by an interpreter, and the respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal found that the claim for a statutory redundancy payment was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,590, calculated on the basis of an effective date of termination of 6 January 2025, five complete years of employment, age 45 at the date of dismissal, and a gross weekly pay of £370, producing a figure of 7 x £370.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons were not to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 7 x £370 gross weekly pay (5 complete years of service at age 45, EDT 06 January 2025). Respondent did not attend. | Upheld | — | £2,590 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,590
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,590
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.