Case 6012084/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mx R Griffiths v Canning Hospitality Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012084/2025
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedMx R Griffiths
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Slater determined that a judgment could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 without a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages of £591.25 gross, that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of £282.70 gross, and that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice with damages of £295.63 (calculated on a gross basis to reflect likely Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment).
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £1,169.58 in total. A separate notice was issued under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 setting the calculation day as 7 November 2025 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
6 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £296 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £296 |
Legal tests applied
2 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,170
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.