Case 6012084/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mx R Griffiths v Canning Hospitality Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012084/2025
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mx R Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Slater determined that a judgment could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 without a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages of £591.25 gross, that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of £282.70 gross, and that the Claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice with damages of £295.63 (calculated on a gross basis to reflect likely Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment).
The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £1,169.58 in total. A separate notice was issued under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 setting the calculation day as 7 November 2025 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages of £591.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of £282.70 gross. | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £295.63 (calculated using gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment). | Upheld | — | £296 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages of £591.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday entitlement of £282.70 gross. | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £295.63 (calculated using gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment). | Upheld | — | £296 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,170
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.