Case 6012103/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Rey v The Bruno Effect Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012103/2024
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Rey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 20 February 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Quill determined that judgment could properly be entered under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £12,500 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £4,486.00, described as one month’s net remuneration.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £2,915.00 net. The claim described as loss of earnings for 31 August to 9 September was dismissed because the claimant did not have the right to claim unfair dismissal and because that period had already been compensated by the breach of contract award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £12,500 gross. | Upheld | — | £12,500 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £4,486.00, described as one month’s net remuneration. | Upheld | — | £4,486 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £2,915.00 net. | Upheld | — | £2,915 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim for loss of earnings for 31 August to 9 September was dismissed because the claimant did not have the right to claim unfair dismissal and because that period was already compensated by the breach of contract award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,901
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.