Case 6012119/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Grimes v Excel Civil Enforcement Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012119/2024
- Decision date
- 22 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Grimes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms J Grimes was disabled from 1 March 2024 for the purpose of her Equality Act 2010 complaints. The written record states that this finding was made pursuant to section 6 Equality Act 2010.
As a consequence, the Claimant’s complaints of direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment were limited to events occurring after 1 March 2024. The written record does not set out any final liability findings on those complaints or any monetary remedy.
The document states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. It therefore records the disability-status finding and its procedural consequence for the EqA complaints, but not a substantive disposal of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records a preliminary finding that the Claimant was disabled from 1 March 2024 for the purpose of her Equality Act 2010 complaints. It does not record a final liability decision on the underlying discrimination complaints. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.