Case 6012191/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Michael Lambrianos v S10 Holding Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012191/2025
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Michael Lambrianos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 August 2025 before Employment Judge Isaacson, the tribunal found that Mr Michael Lambrianos was an employee or worker of S10 Holding Limited at the relevant time. It upheld his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages, finding that deductions had been made in relation to the period January to 3 March 2025.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £672.10 for January 2025 and £176.92 for March 2025, together with £50.20 and £58.19 for gross commission payments owed and unpaid during employment. It also ordered the claimant to pay any tax or National Insurance due on those sums.
The tribunal further upheld the holiday pay complaint, finding that holiday pay had not been paid for leave accrued but untaken when the employment ended. It awarded £769.28, calculated as four days at a daily rate of £192.32, with the claimant again responsible for any tax or National Insurance due. The total amount payable was £1,726.69.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £672.10 for January 2025, £176.92 for March 2025, plus £50.20 and £58.19 for gross commission payments owed and unpaid during employment. | Upheld | — | £957 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found holiday pay was unpaid for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended and awarded £769.28, calculated as four days at the daily rate of £192.32. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,727
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.