Case 6012218/2024 · Employment Tribunal
I Korwek v Madinska & Co Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012218/2024
- Decision date
- 12 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
I Korwek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim on a Rule 22 basis because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Cookson determined the matter without a contested hearing and the listed hearing on 20 February 2025 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £6,300.51, made up of £2,883.84 for the pay period 1/7/2024 to 31/7/2024 and £3,416.67 for 1/8/2024 to 31/8/2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 22. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the periods 1/7/2024 to 31/7/2024 and 1/8/2024 to 31/8/2024. | Upheld | — | £6,301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,301
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.