Case 6012250/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person Interpreter: Ms Munton, Russian speaking For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012250/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person Interpreter: Ms Munton, Russian speaking For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 12 and 13 May 2025 before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone. The claimant was Mr Aleksejs Bogdanovs, appearing in person with a Russian-speaking interpreter, and the respondent was Tesco Stores Limited represented by counsel.
The written judgment records only one adjudicated claim: unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal held that this claim failed and was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. No further findings of fact or legal reasoning are set out in the written record supplied here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records that the claim for an unlawful deduction of wages failed and was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.