Case 6012395/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Nicholson v The Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Constabulary — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012395/2024
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woodhead Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Nicholson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs N Nicholson withdrew her complaints of direct and indirect disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 at a preliminary hearing for case management on 2 July 2025.
At a preliminary hearing for case management on 27 November 2025, the claimant agreed that those withdrawn complaints should be dismissed on withdrawal, and the tribunal dismissed them. The judgment states that her complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew her complaint of direct disability discrimination at a preliminary hearing on 2 July 2025, and at a preliminary hearing on 27 November 2025 agreed that it should be dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant withdrew her complaint of indirect disability discrimination at a preliminary hearing on 2 July 2025, and at a preliminary hearing on 27 November 2025 agreed that it should be dismissed on withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.