Case 6012404/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rumbolt v P5 Creative Build Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012404/2025
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rumbolt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Watford Employment Tribunal on 10 April 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment records that the respondent had asserted that the party owing the claimant unpaid wages was Darren Blackwell, trading as PS Creative Build. The judge considered it appropriate to give judgment for the sum claimed, referring to the coincidence between the respondent's name and the trading name.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's salary for December 2024, stated as GBP 2,013.36 net. The respondent was ordered to pay that net sum to the claimant and to pay HMRC any income tax and national insurance payable in relation to it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was made under rule 22 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The award is stated as net salary for December 2024. | Upheld | — | £2,013 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,013
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.