Case 6012417/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Peters v Malachi Aniemeka — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012417/2024
- Decision date
- 14 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Attendances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Peters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Peters brought claims against Mr Malachi Aniemeka for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent did not attend and had failed to file a response, so judgment was entered under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
On the material before it, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in June and July 2024 and had also failed to pay her notice pay. The tribunal therefore upheld the wage deduction and notice pay claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unauthorised deduction from wages in June and July 2024. The award was not split between this claim and the notice pay element. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's notice pay. The judgment did not allocate a separate sum to this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £436
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.