Case 6012447/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sameer v Tesco Stores Limited Decided: In Chambers on the papers — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012447/2024
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sameer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Shore decided the case in chambers on the papers on 24 March 2025. The only claim identified in the judgment was age discrimination by Mr M Sameer against Tesco Stores Limited.
The Tribunal recorded that Mr Sameer did not reply to its order requiring him to give reasons why his age discrimination claim should not be struck out by 4:00pm on Tuesday 18 March 2025. On that basis, the claim of age discrimination was duly struck out.
No substantive findings were made on the merits of the age discrimination allegation, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note attached to the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Struck out because the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's order to give reasons why the age discrimination claim should not be struck out by 4:00pm on Tuesday 18 March 2025. The judgment gives no substantive reasons on the underlying allegation. | Struck out | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.