Case 6012448/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Singh v Singular Intelligence Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012448/2024
- Decision date
- 4 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bann Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 22 September 2024 and served at the respondent’s Companies House address. The respondent did not enter a response, and Employment Judge J Bann determined that the case could properly be decided as a default judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under rule 22. The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract of employment dated 3 April 2023 by failing to pay salary in accordance with the remuneration clause, including paying only 50% of salary for July and August 2023, paying no salary for September 2023, December 2023, and February to 14 May 2024, and paying only £238.10 of £1,833.33 for January 2024. | Upheld | — | £13,490 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,490
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, rule 22
- section 15C(2) Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
- Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, rule 10(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.