Case 6012477/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J Jayanetti v Staxo Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012477/2025
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Jayanetti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 11 April 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The hearing listed on 10 September 2025 was cancelled.
On the merits, the tribunal found that J Jayanetti had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,968.75 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £39.82 gross. The total awarded was £2,008.57 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,968.75 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,969 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £39.82 gross. | Upheld | — | £40 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,009
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.