Case 6012492/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Rutherford Gregory v Chester Sexual Abuse Support Service — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012492/2025
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Rutherford Gregory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs H Rutherford Gregory brought a claim against Chester Sexual Abuse Support Service for unlawful deduction of wages. Employment Judge Thompson sat alone at Manchester by CVP on 16 October 2025. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction of wages was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £925.53, with the claimant responsible for NI and tax. No other claims or remedy components were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages to be well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £925.53. The claimant was to be responsible for NI and tax. | Upheld | — | £926 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £926
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.