Case 6012504/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Harden v Bailey Montagu — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012504/2024
- Decision date
- 26 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Harden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Atkins, sitting alone at London South on 26 February 2025, decided the claimant's breach of contract claims and found that they did not succeed. The judgment records two elements of the claim: employer pension contribution payments for the first three months of employment, and two months' worth of notice pay and pension contribution payments.
The tribunal stated that these claims were not well founded. No monetary award was made, and the written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant's claims for employer pension contribution payments for the first three months of employment, and for two months' notice pay and pension contribution payments, were not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.