Case 6012517/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Amanda Slater v Secretary State — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012517/2025
- Decision date
- 15 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bennett JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Amanda Slater
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAmanda Slater's complaint of arrears of pay concerning a November 2024 commission payment of £892.19, relating to commission earned in October 2024, did not succeed and was dismissed.
Her other complaints succeeded. The Tribunal declared that her commission earnings should have been included in the calculation of her statutory redundancy payment and payment in lieu of notice. It held the Secretary of State for Business and Trade liable to pay £6,056.29 in additional statutory redundancy pay and £3,389.54 in additional notice pay from the National Insurance Fund, making a total of £9,445.83.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of arrears of pay concerning a £892.19 November 2024 commission payment relating to commission earned in October 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The Tribunal declared that commission earnings should have been included in the calculation of the statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,056 |
| Other | Additional notice pay from the National Insurance Fund; the Tribunal declared that commission earnings should have been included in its calculation. | Upheld | — | £3,390 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,446
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.