Case 6012520/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M R Rahman-Harries v LLG NWD Ltd t/a Lewtas Logistics Group — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012520/2024
- Decision date
- 5 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M R Rahman-Harries
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim brought by Mr M R Rahman-Harries against LLG NWD Ltd t/a Lewtas Logistics Group. By a letter dated 16 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 27 September 2024, and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge T V Ryan on 5 January 2025, and the order was sent to the parties on 5 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separately identify this cause of action; the claim was struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify this cause of action; the claim was struck out as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.