Case 6012565/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Simon v MindWeaver Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 6012565/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Simon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 23 September 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Hutchings determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure without a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £17,307.60 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,254.22.
The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant is £18,561.82. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Hutchings on 12 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 18 December 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment records unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £17,307.60 gross. Rounded to nearest GBP. | Upheld | — | £17,308 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment records failure to pay holiday entitlement; respondent ordered to pay £1,254.22. Rounded to nearest GBP. | Upheld | — | £1,254 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,562
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.