Case 6012582/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Sweetman v Dcb Group Estates Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012582/2025
- Decision date
- 18 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Sweetman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 11 April 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge M Butler decided that the claim, or part of it, could be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 13 to 19 January 2025 and ordered the respondent to pay £480.48 gross.
The tribunal also held that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for 40 hours of holiday taken from 20 to 25 January 2025, and ordered payment of £457.60 gross as further unauthorised deductions from wages. It further ordered payment of £915.20 gross for 80 hours of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination.
The total gross sum ordered was £1,853.28. The judgment recorded that the claimant would be responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the gross award if the gross figure was received and tax was not deducted from source. The accompanying notice stated that interest would not be payable if the sum was paid in full within 14 days after 10 June 2026; otherwise interest would accrue from 11 June 2026 at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 13 to 19 January 2025. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for 40 hours of holiday taken from 20 to 25 January 2025, recorded as payable under regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and as further unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £458 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken annual leave entitlement of 80 hours on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £915 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,853
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
- regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.