Case 6012592/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012592/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr I Morrison, Ms J Keene
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, comprising Employment Judge Perry sitting with Mr I Morrison and Ms J Keene, heard the claimant's disability discrimination complaints against DHL Services Limited at Birmingham over 15-18 December 2025. An application by the claimant to amend to include a complaint of direct discrimination was not pursued, on the basis that the respondent indicated it would not pursue a costs application in that event.
The tribunal found that the claimant was discriminated against because of something arising from his disability, and that complaint succeeded. The separate complaint that the respondent had failed to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed.
Compensation was assessed at £4,700 for injury to feelings, with £547 interest on that award, plus £642.79 net financial loss and £37.33 interest on financial loss, producing a total of £5,927.12. Written reasons were not provided as the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability (s.15 EqA 2010) succeeded; compensation comprised injury to feelings £4,700, interest on injury to feelings £547, financial loss (net) £642.79, interest on financial loss £37.33, total £5,927.12. | Upheld | Disability | £5,927 |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,927
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.