Case 6012679/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hinton v TA Restaurant Holdings Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012679/2025
- Decision date
- 6 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Close Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hinton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a former Operations Director, brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract concerning his salary entitlement, holiday pay, and time off in lieu (TOIL) following his employment with the respondent (a restaurant company) from March to December 2024. The hearing took place at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP.
On the principal salary issue, the tribunal found the contractual remuneration structure was National Minimum Wage 'house pay' (£26,768/9) plus non-guaranteed tronc (forecast at £33,250) totalling around £60,000, rather than a guaranteed £60,000 basic salary plus tronc as the claimant contended. The tribunal therefore dismissed the salary-related deductions, breach of contract, and holiday pay claims, as well as the claim for one day's pay for 20 December 2024.
The tribunal found there was an oral agreement that the claimant would receive TOIL for additional hours worked. However, the tribunal accepted the respondent's investigation finding that the claimant had worked 49 additional hours (rather than the 21.46 days he claimed). At the NMW rate of £11.44/hour the gross sum due was £560.56, which had been unlawfully deducted from his wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £560.56 gross, subject to tax/NI deductions.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Salary claim (claimant's contention he was entitled to £60,000 basic salary plus tronc) not well-founded; tribunal found contractual entitlement was NMW house pay plus non-guaranteed tronc. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim regarding the £60,000 salary not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for one day's pay for 20 December 2024 dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract regarding one day's pay for 20 December 2024 dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Time off in lieu (TOIL) claim upheld for 49 additional hours at NMW £11.44/hr; £560.56 gross. PDF truncated from 38,091 characters. | Upheld | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £561
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.