Case 6012681/2024 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Mr George (litigation Consultant) — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012681/2024
- Decision date
- 7 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Povey, sitting at Swansea Civil Justice Centre on 3 and 4 April 2025, found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was made out and succeeded. The judgment is brief and records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, with no written reasons provided in the decision notice.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £44,784.75. The stated breakdown included a £1,400 basic award, loss of earnings of £9,350.00 for 28 June 2024 to 15 September 2024, loss of earnings of £13,106.84 for 16 September 2024 to 4 April 2025, loss of earnings of £11,750.96 for 5 April 2025 to 4 October 2025, and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment also refers to an ACAS uplift.
The written record says the total announced at the hearing on 4 April 2025, £33,097.25, was incorrect because the £9,350.00 loss-of-earnings item had been omitted from the final calculation and the ACAS uplift had not been applied to that amount. The recoupment annex states that the prescribed element was £9,350.00 for the period 28 June 2024 to 15 September 2024 and that the monetary award exceeded that element by £35,434.75.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint succeeded and orders payment of £44,784.75. The extracted line-item figure for the ACAS uplift in paragraph 2.3 does not arithmetically reconcile with that total; the annex records a prescribed element of £9,350.00 and an excess of £35,434.75. | Upheld | — | £44,785 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £44,785
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,400
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £34,708
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.