Case 6012782/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Kingdon v Ecs Holdings Winstons Restaurant Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012782/2025
- Decision date
- 12 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray-Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedMrs B Kingdon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid accrued and untaken holiday pay, and breach of contract against the Respondent. The hearing was held by CVP at Bristol on 12 December 2025 before Employment Judge Gray-Jones sitting alone, with the Claimant in person and no attendance or representation from the Respondent.
All three complaints succeeded under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claims had not been responded to. The Tribunal awarded £1,217.81 gross for unpaid wages in February 2025 and £951.38 gross for unpaid wages from 1 to 23 March 2025 (totalling £2,169.19 gross for unauthorised deductions), £577.50 for accrued and untaken holiday pay, and £252.13 (20.17 hours at £12.50) gross for the breach of contract claim relating to shortfall of hours.
The total sum awarded was £2,998.82.
Claims and outcomes
6 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £2,169 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £252 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £2,169 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £252 |
Legal tests applied
1 referenceRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,999
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.