Case 6012870/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Natasha Cleary v Amna Tariq STRIKE OUT — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012870/2024
- Decision date
- 3 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Natasha Cleary
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNatasha Cleary brought a claim for unfair dismissal against Amna Tariq. The tribunal dismissed the claim at the threshold stage, recording that the claimant did not have two years' service with the respondent and therefore could not bring an unfair dismissal claim under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment is a short strike out decision and does not record any hearing on the merits of dismissal, any findings about the reason for dismissal, or any compensatory or basic award. No remedy was awarded because the claim failed on the service requirement point.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have two years' service with the respondent and therefore could not bring a claim under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.