Case 6012913/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Archer v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012913/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Archer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, heard at London Central by CVP on 15 and 16 October 2025 before Employment Judge Emery, records two substantive outcomes. The complaint of unfair dismissal was found to be well-founded, and the tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was not well-founded and was dismissed. The supplied text does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning for either claim, and it does not record any monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The supplied judgment text records that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. No detailed reasons or remedy figures appear in the extract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The supplied judgment text records that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was not well-founded and was dismissed. No detailed reasons appear in the extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.