Case 6012967/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Gregor v Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012967/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Gregor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 January 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss Gregor an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why her claim should not be struck out. The reason given was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because it was a claim the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear.
Miss Gregor did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 4 April 2025 would not take place. The reasons do not identify any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success, being a claim the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear, after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 16 January 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.