Case 6012995/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R London v Peckwater Investments Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6012995/2024
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R London
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Davidson at London Central by CVP on 7 May 2025. The claimant was Ms R London and the respondent was Peckwater Investments Limited. The judgment records representation by the claimant in person and by Mr T Fuller, CILEx, for the respondent.
The tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claim on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. It also refused the claimant's application to exclude the respondent's witness statements on the ground that they had been produced after the date for exchange.
The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claim and does not record any award or other final remedy. The only outcomes recorded are the refusal of both preliminary applications.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claim and refused the claimant's application to exclude the respondent's witness statements. The merits of the underlying unfair dismissal claim were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.