Case 6013012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Scot Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013012/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hughes
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Mrs V Blake, Ms R Clarke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Exeter before Employment Judge David Hughes with Mrs V Blake and Ms R Clarke, dismissed the majority of the Claimant's claims. The claims for wrongful dismissal/notice pay, whistleblowing detriment, automatically unfair dismissal, dismissal for asserting a statutory right, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and disability arising from discrimination were each found not well-founded and were dismissed.
The Claimant succeeded on her holiday pay claim. The tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken at the date her employment ended, and ordered the Respondent to pay £23.33, with the Claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The breach of contract claim was also well-founded, but the tribunal found that the breach caused the Claimant no loss and made no award of compensation in respect of it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the rules.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Claim for wrongful dismissal/notice pay found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Whistleblowing detriment claim found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal and dismissal for asserting a statutory right both found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and (as worded in the judgment) 'disability arising from discrimination' all found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination; £23.33 awarded. | Upheld | — | £23 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The holiday pay finding is expressed by the tribunal as an unauthorised deduction from wages; recorded here as the same successful claim. Award shown against the holiday_pay claim to avoid double-counting. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.