Case 6013096/2025 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013096/2025
- Decision date
- 7 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smeaton
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Watford by CVP before Employment Judge Smeaton alone, heard the Claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 on 26 June 2025. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel, Mc C Musgrove-Cohen.
The judgment records that the application for interim relief was refused. Oral reasons were given at the hearing in accordance with rule 62(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution of Rules and Procedures) Regulations 2013. No separate liability findings, remedy calculation, or monetary award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only the refusal of the Claimant's application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No substantive liability findings or separate monetary award are recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 62(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution of Rules and Procedures) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.