Case 6013106/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Phillip Eccles v Four Seasons Fruiterers Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013106/2024
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Richardson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Phillip Eccles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Southampton, sitting by CVP before Employment Judge K Richardson on 9 to 10 October 2025, dismissed all three complaints brought by Phillip Eccles against Four Seasons Fruiterers Limited. The written judgment records that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract were each found not well-founded.
The decision record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual tribunal procedure, so the written judgment itself contains only the outcome and not the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this complaint as one of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.