Case 6013113/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L C Howard v Oldham Premier Bathroom & Kitchens Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013113/2025
- Decision date
- 29 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L C Howard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 24 April 2026, and by consent, the tribunal determined that Mrs L C Howard was entitled to a redundancy payment from Oldham Premier Bathroom & Kitchens Limited. Her employment as a Sales Manager terminated on 27 January 2025 after 12 completed years of service. The tribunal also determined that she was entitled to notice pay amounting to 12 weeks, based on those completed years of service.
Mrs Howard withdrew her unfair dismissal complaint at the hearing, and that complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. Liability for the redundancy payment and notice pay had been determined, but no monetary award was recorded. The final hearing listed for 28 and 29 May 2026 was converted to a remedy hearing to quantify the losses arising from the successful complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The amount was left for determination at the remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This concerned entitlement to 12 weeks' notice pay; the amount was left for determination at the remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.