Case 6013137/2024 · Employment Tribunal
H C Tsang v The Scooter.Shop Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013137/2024
- Decision date
- 8 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Appearances
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H C Tsang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Walker, sitting at Croydon on 8 December 2025, heard the claim of H C Tsang against The Scooter.Shop Ltd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment records that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded in respect of the period 8 August 2023 to 11 July 2024.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,605.16, being the gross sum deducted, with the respondent responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. The tribunal additionally found that the respondent had failed to give the claimant written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period April 2024 to July 2024 inclusive.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the standard 14-day rule. No discrimination or dismissal claims were before the tribunal on the face of this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 8 August 2023 to 11 July 2024. Award is the gross sum deducted; respondent responsible for any tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £3,605 |
| Other | Tribunal found the respondent failed to give written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for April 2024 to July 2024 inclusive. No monetary remedy was attached in the judgment text. Not a direct fit for the locked claim_type enum, hence 'other'. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,605
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.