Case 6013226/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Sally Elliot v I.O.O. Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6013226/2026
- Decision date
- 29 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sally Elliot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSally Elliot presented her claim against I.O.O. Limited in the London South Employment Tribunal on 15 April 2026. The respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The tribunal decided that it could determine the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages between June and October 2025 and ordered payment of £4,706.99. It also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £11,623.50. The respondent was ordered to pay £16,330.49 in total. The hearing scheduled for 17 September 2026 was no longer required and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,707 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £11,624 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,330
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.