Case 6013231/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Thomas v Retox Digital Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013231/2025
- Decision date
- 23 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 16 April 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Sweeney decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Found well-founded on liability. Amounts were deferred to the remedy hearing listed for 21 August 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim concerned notice pay and was found well-founded. Amounts were deferred to the remedy hearing listed for 21 August 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim was for failure to pay a statutory redundancy payment and was found well-founded. Amounts were deferred to the remedy hearing listed for 21 August 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim was found well-founded. Amounts were deferred to the remedy hearing listed for 21 August 2025. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.