Case 6013325/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Tomlinson v MNG Payments Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013325/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Tomlinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Crosfill found that MNG Payments Limited unlawfully deducted £22,880.88 from Mr J Tomlinson’s salary on 30 June, 31 July and 31 August 2024, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims under section 23 were well founded.
The respondent did not appear or provide representation at the hearing on 21 February 2025 at East London Hearing Centre, conducted by video. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Tomlinson £22,880.66 forthwith. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that £22,880.88 was unlawfully deducted, but the order requires payment of £22,880.66. The ordered figure is used for the remedy amount, with the discrepancy noted. | Upheld | — | £22,881 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,881
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.