Case 6013352/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Monaghan v Kunal Minimarket Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013352/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Monaghan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 30 September 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Deeley stated that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The judgment records that the tribunal would later hear the claimant’s complaints of non-payment of sick pay and underpayments of pension contributions on 24 March 2025.
On the claims determined in this judgment, the tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to the balance of her statutory redundancy payment of £6,573.95. Those findings were recorded separately from the later hearing listed for sick pay and pension contribution issues.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract because she was not given notice or full payment in lieu of notice. Damages were awarded in the gross amount of £3,351.20, described as the balance of 12 weeks’ notice pay. The tribunal also found that the respondent had underpaid the claimant’s holiday entitlement on termination of employment and ordered payment of £1,067.90 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. No separate monetary amount was set out for this head of claim in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to the balance of her statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,574 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment described the dismissal as in breach of contract because the claimant was not given notice or full payment in lieu of notice; damages were assessed by reference to the balance of 12 weeks’ notice pay. | Upheld | — | £3,351 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had underpaid the claimant’s holiday entitlement on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,068 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,993
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.