Case 6013361/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Greenwood v Bevancare Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013361/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Greenwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 6 December 2024, the tribunal gave Miss C Greenwood an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out on the basis that she did not have the sufficient two years' service required to bring such a claim.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 25 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the sufficient two years' service to bring such a claim and did not make sufficient representations after being given an opportunity to do so by letter dated 6 December 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.