Case 6013370/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C Johnston v Samuel James Events Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6013370/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the case under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £780.00, calculated as 1 x 0.5 x £520.00 plus 1 x 1 x £520.00.
The judgment also records that the claims for unfair dismissal, holiday pay and notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The hearing listed for 21 July 2025 was cancelled.
The attached interest notice states that interest is payable under article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. The relevant decision day was 25 June 2025, the calculation day was 26 June 2025, and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum, but no separate interest amount was calculated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £780.00, calculated as 1 x 0.5 x £520.00 plus 1 x 1 x £520.00. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a notice pay claim and records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £780
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.